Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

Comparative Hepatology

Open Access

Reduction of liver metastases outgrowth by tumour antigen-pulsed dendritic cell vaccination

  • Anna K Mels1Email author,
  • Ilvy Mayen2,
  • Marjolein van Egmond1,
  • Robert HJ Beelen2,
  • Sybren Meijer1 and
  • Cornelia D Richters2
Comparative Hepatology20043(Suppl 1):S54

https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-5926-2-S1-S54

Published: 14 January 2004

Introduction

Over 50% of patients diagnosed for primary colorectal carcinoma develop liver metastases. Partial liver resection is the single effective treatment improving dismal survival [1]. Since few patients, however, are candidates for resection, development of therapies that prevent formation of liver metastases is warranted.

Outgrowth of metastases may be reduced or prevented by the action of tumour specific T cells, which are activated in T cell areas of lymph nodes by professional antigen presenting cells (APC). Dendritic cells (DC) are the most potent APC, capable of providing the necessary co-stimulatory signals [2]. DC have been derived in vitro from blood monocytes (moDC) for use in clinical trials to generate tumour specific immune responses, and results of vaccination studies in melanoma patients are encouraging [3, 4]. However, vaccination for various other cancer types and treatment of established metastases with antigen-pulsed DC has been disappointing.

In the present study we investigated whether vaccination of rats with tumour antigen-pulsed moDC could prevent outgrowth of experimental liver metastases originating from colorectal cancer. Additionally, the therapeutic effect of moDC on existing micrometastases was evaluated.

Methods

Animals

Male Wag/Rij rats (Charles-River, Maastricht, The Netherlands) weighing 180–220 g were used in all experiments.

CC531 Tumour Cells

CC531 is an adenocarcinoma cell line, originating in the colon of Wag/Rij rats exposed to methylazoxymethanol [5]. CC531 cells were cultured in alpha-RPMI (RPMI 1640 medium, supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 10% heat-inactivated foetal calf serum (FCS; Gibco, Bio-Cult, Irvine, Scotland), 50 micromolars beta-mercapto-ethanol, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 micrograms/ml streptomycin). Cells were detached with trypsin-EDTA solution at 37–C. Viability of cells was assessed by trypan blue exclusion and was always > 95%.

Generation of MoDC

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from heparinized blood by Lymphoprep– (Axis-Shield PoC AS, Oslo, Norway) density gradient centrifugation (d = 1.007 g/ml, 20 min at 800 – g) and placed into culture plates for 2 hours. Subsequently, non-adherent cells were removed and adherent cells were cultured in –-RPMI, containing 5 ng/ml recombinant rat (rr)GM-CSF and rr interleukin (IL)-4 (PharMingen, San Diego, CA, USA) for 7 days. At day 7, non-adherent moDC (moDC-) were isolated by collecting the medium. Viability of cells was always > 95%.

To generate tumour antigen-pulsed moDC (moDC+), a mixture of necrotic and apoptotic CC531 tumour cells was added to moDC- (1:1) at the last day of the 7-day culture. To generate this antigen mixture, CC531 tumour cells were treated with UV-B light, cultured for 24 hours and subsequently subjected to 3 cycles of freezing and thawing.

Induction of Liver Metastases

Rats underwent small laparotomy under general anaesthesia and a loop of the small intestine was exposed. Under microscopic vision, 1 – 106 live CC531 tumour cells in 0.5 ml of PBS were inoculated into the mesenteric vein, followed by ligation of the vein, as described earlier [6].

Vaccination and Treatment Protocol

Rats were immunised subcutaneously with PBS, tumour antigens from 35 – 104 necrotic CC531 cells, 35 – 104 moDC- or 35 – 104 moDC+. In the vaccination protocol, rats were immunised 14 days before inoculation of CC531 cells. Forty days later, rats were sacrificed. In the treatment protocol, rats were inoculated with CC531 tumour cells and immunised 3 days later, when micrometastases had already developed [7]. Rats were sacrificed after an additional 21 days.

Number of tumour nodules was counted macroscopically. Differences were tested using the nonparametric ANOVA with Kruskal-Wallis post-test. Significance was accepted at P < 0.05. Results are expressed as mean – SEM.

Results and Discussion

After vaccination, rats developed 9.1 – 2.7 (PBS, n = 12), 15.6 – 5.5 (CC531 tumour antigens, n = 7), 2.7 – 2.1 (moDC-, n = 7) and 0.8 – 0.4 (moDC+, n = 12) tumour nodules. Vaccination with moDC+ reduced outgrowth compared to PBS (P < 0.01) and CC531 (P < 0.05), indicating that moDC+ vaccination induced effective anti-tumour immune responses. Previously, rat moDC were shown to be capable of migrating to draining lymph nodes and priming T cells in vivo, supporting that injected moDC are fully functional in vivo [8].

Surprisingly, vaccination with moDC- also induced a reduction in tumour outgrowth compared to PBS (P < 0.05). This could have been caused by in vivo generation of bystander T cells directed against foreign FCS components, because CC531 cells, moDC- and moDC+ were all cultured in medium containing FCS. Subsequent recognition of FCS components on CC531 cells might have initiated tumour cytotoxicity. To exclude bystander effects in future vaccination experiments, CC531 cells should be cultured in syngeneic Wag/Rij serum.

None of the four treatment protocols reduced outgrowth of micrometastases (PBS: 1.4 – 0.2, n = 5; CC531 antigens: 2.8 – 1.2, n = 6; moDC-: 1.8 – 0.4, n = 6; moDC+: 5.2 – 2.1, n = 5). This could be due to the fact that in vivo generation of specific T cells after DC vaccination takes several weeks, during which time tumour cells have the opportunity to spread. Additionally, tumour cells have the capacity to suppress immune responses by production of IL-6 [9] and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [10]. In accordance with our earlier data, it might be valuable to administer adjuvants such as GM-CSF to enhance DC functionality [6].

Our results indicate that tumour antigen-pulsed DC vaccination may be valuable in the prevention of liver metastases formation in primary colorectal carcinoma. However, when micrometastases are already present, DC immunisation seems less effective. Characterisation of effector cells and optimisation of immunisation is therefore essential in future studies.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Surgical Oncology, VU University Medical Centre
(2)
Molecular Cell Biology, VU University Medical Centre

References

  1. Sasson AR, Sigurdson ER: Surgical treatment of liver metastases. Semin Oncol. 2002, 29: 107-118. 10.1053/sonc.2002.31676.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Steinman RM: The dendritic cell system and its role in immunogenicity. Annu Rev Immunol. 1991, 9: 271-296. 10.1146/annurev.iy.09.040191.001415.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Romani N, Gruner S, Brang D, Kampgen E, Lenz A, Trockenbacher B, Konwalinka G, Fritsch PO, Steinman RM, Schuler G: Proliferating dendritic cell progenitors in human blood. J Exp Med. 1994, 180: 83-93. 10.1084/jem.180.1.83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Thurner B, Haendle I, Roder C, Dieckmann D, Keikavoussi P, Jonuleit H, Bender A, Maczek C, Schreiner D, von den Driesch P, Brocker EB, Steinman RM, Enk A, Kampgen E, Schuler G: Vaccination with mage-3A1 peptide-pulsed mature, monocyte-derived dendritic cells expands specific cytotoxic T cells and induces regression of some metastases in advanced stage IV melanoma. J Exp Med. 1999, 190: 1669-1678. 10.1084/jem.190.11.1669.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Zedeck MS, Sternberg SS: A model system for studies of colon carcinogenesis: tumor induction by a single injection of methylazoxymethanol acetate. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1974, 53: 1419-1421.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mels AK, Beelen RHJ, Meijer S: Clinical use of GM-CSF in the prevention of liver metastases; a pilot study in the rat on the effect of rmGM-CSF on Kupffer cells. In: Cells of the hepatic sinusoid. 1998, September 27 – October 1. Christchurch, New Zealand. The Kupffer Cell FoundationGoogle Scholar
  7. Heuff G, van der Ende MB, Boutkan H, Prevoo W, Bayon LG, Fleuren GJ, Beelen RH, Meijer S, Dijkstra CD: Macrophage populations in different stages of induced hepatic metastases in rats: an immunohistochemical analysis. Scand J Immunol. 1993, 38: 10-16. 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1993.tb01688.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Richters CD, Mayen I, Havenith CE, Beelen RH, Kamperdijk EW: Rat monocyte-derived dendritic cells function and migrate in the same way as isolated tissue dendritic cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2002, 71: 582-587.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Menetrier-Caux C, Montmain G, Dieu MC, Bain C, Favrot MC, Caux C, Blay JY: Inhibition of the differentiation of dendritic cells from CD34(+) progenitors by tumor cells: role of interleukin-6 and macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Blood. 1998, 92: 4778-4791.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gabrilovich DI, Chen HL, Girgis KR, Cunningham HT, Meny GM, Nadaf S, Kavanaugh D, Carbone DP: Production of vascular endothelial growth factor by human tumors inhibits the functional maturation of dendritic cells. Nat Med. 1996, 2: 1096-1103. 10.1038/nm1096-1096.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Mels et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd 2004

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement