Open Access

Distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes in patients infected by different sources and its correlation with clinical and virological parameters: a preliminary study

Comparative Hepatology20065:4

DOI: 10.1186/1476-5926-5-4

Received: 18 January 2005

Accepted: 02 October 2006

Published: 02 October 2006

Abstract

Background

Information about genotypes and associated risk factors in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected patients in Iran is limited. The aim of this study was to identify the HCV genotypes and associated risk factors in a group of HCV infected patients from Iran.

Results

Genotyping analysis was performed in 156 patients with positive anti-HCV and HCV-RNA. Patients were questioned concerning documented risk factors. Genotypes 1 and 3 were found in 87 (55.8%) and 45 (28.8%) patients, respectively. The most frequent HCV subtype was 1a (37.8), followed by 3a (28.9%) and 1b (16.7%). There was no statistically significant difference between the risk factors analyzed and the acquisition of HCV infection. We further found that 18 (40%) and 17 (37.8%) patients that were intravenous drug users (IVDU) had genotype 1a and 3a respectively.

Conclusion

Genotypes 3a and 1a in Iran are less prevalent in IVDU than in Europe and USA, but there is a high similarity between the pattern of genotype in IVDU in both Europe and United States, and Iran. However, in this case it can not be due to people migration among countries since history of travel abroad existed only in 6 cases (13.3%).

Background

Chronic hepatitis C infection is now recognized as an important health problem [1]. Approximately 2–3% of the world population is infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). HCV is one of the leading causes of liver failure and cancer, and the single most common indication for liver transplantation [2, 3]. In Iran, the prevalence of HCV infection is about 0.12% in blood donors [4], but it is increasing. It seems that the prevalence of HCV infection is less than 1 percent in our general population, but the infection is emerging mostly because of problems such as intravenous drug use and needle sharing among drug addicts. HCV infection is the most prevalent cause of chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis in hemophiliac [5] and thalassemic patients [6], and patients with renal failure [7] in Iran. Different HCV isolates worldwide show substantial nucleotide sequence variability throughout the viral genome [811].

In the present study, we used PCR analysis with type-specific primers for identification of the HVC genomic typing, which enable the separation into six major genotypes (1 to 6) and a series of subtypes (e.g., a, b, c) [1215]. These viral types and subtypes differ in their geographical distribution and antigenicity [8]. Types 1, 2 and 3 are distributed almost worldwide [1622]. Types 4, 5 and 6 have been found in distinct geographical areas [12, 20, 21, 23]. Interestingly, not only do the HCV genotypes seem to differ in nucleotide sequence and geographical distribution, but there is also evidence of biological differences between the three HCV genotypes. Patients with HCV subtype 1b have a poorer response to interferon alpha treatment [2427]. Mode of transmission may also affect distribution of HCV genotypes [2831].

Whereas the distribution of HCV genotypes in many countries is well documented, reliable data are still missing with respect to the frequency of the different HCV genotypes in Iran. We therefore conducted a study on patients with HCV infection, and correlated the mode of transmission, and the age, sex, and liver histology with the predominance of different genotypes. Accurate knowledge of HCV genotypes in our community is essential for successful future research into vaccine development and control strategy. Such information is needed to correctly formulate healthcare policies, prioritize interventions and allocate resources, accordingly. The aim of our study was to understand the main routes of transmission of HCV in our population, chosen from a referral clinic in Tehran, the capital of Iran.

Results

The distribution of HCV genotypes evaluated in 156 patients by genotype screening [32] showed a major prevalence of HCV genotype 1 in 87 (55.8%) cases. Forty-five (28.8%) patients were infected with genotype 3, 2 patients (1.3%) with genotype 4, and 1 patient (0.6%) had mixed infection with genotypes 1 and 3. Genotyping was impossible in 21 patients. The distribution of subtypes of HCV genotypes related to age, sex, source of infection, Knodell's histological activity index (HAI), status of the liver disease, complete blood cell count (CBC), liver function tests (LFT), fasting blood sugar (FBS), triglyceride (TG), cholesterol, and serum protein electrophoresis given are compared in Table 1.
Table 1

Presentation of the 156 Iranian patients in relation to HCV-genotype.

Presentation of patients

HCV-genotype

Sig.

 

1a (N = 59)

1b (N = 26)

1a & 1b (N = 2)

3ac(N = 45)

4 (N = 2)

 

Age (years) a

37.5 ± 1.7

38.7 ± 2.4

46.5 ± 2.5

39.6 ± 1.8

46.5 ± 3.5

NSd

Male/Female (%male)

47/12 (79.7)

19/7 (73.1)

2/0 (100)

39/7 (84.8)

1/1 (50)

NS

Transmission of HCV

      

Post-transfusional

24 (42.1)

10 (17.5)

1 (1.8)

15 (26.3)

0

NS

IVDA

18 (40)

5 (11.1)

0

18 (40)

0

NS

Sexual

16 (36.4)

6 (13.6)

0

19 (43.2)

0

NS

Hemodialysis

7 (36.8)

2 (10.5)

1 (5.3)

4 (21.1)

2 (10.5)

0.001

Hemophilia

3 (60)

0

0

2 (40)

0

NS

Thalassemia

5 (55.6)

2 (22.2)

0

1 (11.1)

0

NS

Inmate

12 (34.3)

2 (5.7)

0

17 (48.6)

0

0.041

Travel abroad

9 (40.9)

3 (13.6)

1 (4.5)

7 (31.8)

0

NS

Hejamat e

8 (25)

6 (18.8)

1 (3.1)

14 (43.8)

1 (3.1)

NS

Other risk factors

10 (34.5)

5 (17.2)

0

7 (24.1)

0

NS

Cirrhosis

7

5

0

7

0

NS

HAI a, b

7.8 ± 1.1

10 ± 1.3

3 ± .0

8.6 ± 1.1

12 ± .0

NS

AST (U/L)

59.9 ± 5.8

67.8 ± 9.5

48.5 ± 12.5

71.1 ± 7.5

91.5 ± 75.5

NS

ALT (U/L)

73.6 ± 7.2

94.1 ± 14.8

40 ± 5

94.7 ± 10

139.5 ± 113.5

NS

WBC (/ml)

6866 ± 501

7405 ± 578

7000 ± 500

6993 ± 366

6500 ± 500

NS

PLT (/ml)

227281 ± 20455

194560 ± 10377

314000 ± .0

217391 ± 12168

244500 ± 22500

NS

Hgb (g/dl)

14.1 ± .33

14.5 ± .42

14.2 ± 2.6

14.5 ± .32

14.4 ± 2.2

NS

FBS (mg/dl)

105.4 ± 6.8

102.7 ± 9.4

97 ± 11

102.7 ± 8

106.5 ± 1.5

NS

TG (mg/dl)

142.3 ± 11.2

123.2 ± 10.7

176 ± 110

101.1 ± 6.9

215 ± 143

.016

Cholesterol (mg/dl)

159.7 ± 6.4

173.8 ± 9.1

185 ± .0

140.8 ± 7.3

186 ± 73

NS

Serum albumin (g/dl)

3.9 ± .08

4.1 ± .13

3.6 ± .25

4.1 ± .1

-

NS

Serum protein (g/dl)

7.4 ± .11

7.6 ± .18

6.4 ± .65

7.8 ± .13

-

.034

Serum iron

132.6 ± 13.8

118.4 ± 18.8

-

81.1 ± 8.8

110 ± .0

.024

Weight (Kg)

71.6 ± 1.9

70.5 ± 3.4

75.5 ± 14.5

72.7 ± 1.9

84.5 ± 2.5

NS

Height (cm)

170.8 ± 1.3

167.3 ± 2.1

169.5 ± 1.5

171.8 ± 1.2

163 ± 11

NS

a Mean ± SE; b Histological activity index; c One patient had a mixed infection (3a(β)/1a); d Not significant; e A procedure in Iranian traditional medicine done by making shallow cuts on the trunk (upper back) and producing a suction effect that results in drawing blood from cuts (less than 100 cc). It is usually done by a non-physician, using non-standard instruments (done for healing or cure purposes). It is also named "cupping".

The alanino aminotransferase (ALT) level was not statistically different in cases with different genotypes, although it was slight higher in cases with genotype 4 and lower in cases with mixed genotype

There was any significant association between subtypes of HCV genotypes and the presence of anti-HBsAb (hepatitis B surface antibody), anti-HBcAb (hepatitis B core antibody), splenomegaly, ascitis, edema, cirrhosis, grade and stage of liver biopsy, and child score and status (inactive, chronic, cirrhotic and active) of the disease; revealing inexistence of any association between disease severity (grade, stage, child score and status of the disease) and different genotypes.

Only one patient with mixed infection with genotype 1a and 1b and two cases with genotype 3a had co-infection with hepatitis B virus (P < 0.001). Only one patient with mixed infection with genotype 1a and 1b and one case with genotype 1b had jaundice (P < 0.001). History of jaundice was seen more in cases with mixed infection with genotype 1a and 1b (2, 100%), 1a (12, 20.3%), 3a (6, 13%), and 1b (3, 11.5%). Any cases with genotype 4 had no history of jaundice.

From the 156 patients, only 135 cases had typeable genotypes. There were 8 cases with negative HCV RNA among 21 patients with a non-typeable genotype. We were unable to determine the genotype of the rest of 18 cases with the genotype-specific primer (GSP) method. One-hundred thirty patients had chronic hepatitis, either requiring treatment (89 patients) or not (41 patients). Other 26 patients were cirrhotic and needed supportive treatment. Duration of hepatitis for patients with both post transfusion and IVDU contamination were 10.6 ± 2.75 and 8.9 ± 3.53 years, respectively.

There was not any statistical significant association between the places of infection of the patients and genotype. However, genotype 4 was found only in north and west of country and mixed infection with genotype 1a and 1b only in center. In this study, the dominant genotype(s) in different regions of Iran consist: 1a, 1b and 3a in center and west, 1a and 3a in north and 1a in south and east (table 2). The geographic distribution of the patients with a typeable genotyping is summarized in table 2.
Table 2

The geographic distribution of the patients and their most prevalent genotypes.

Infection place

N° (Percent)*

Prevalent genotypes: N° (Percent)§

  

1a

1b

3a

4

mix

Center

77 (57.6)

33 (42.8)

15 (19.5)

27 (35.1)

0

2 (2.6)

North

18 (13.4)

7 (38.9)

2 (11.1)

8 (44.4)

1 (5.6)

0

South

1 (.7)

1 (100)

0

0

0

0

East

5 (3.7)

4 (80)

0

1 (20)

0

0

West

31 (23.1)

13 (41.9)

8 (25.8)

9 (29)

1 (3.2)

0

out of Iran

2 (1.5)

1 (50)

1 (50)

0

0

0

*Percents of cases from different geographic parts.

§Percents of the different genotypes in different geographic parts.

Discussion

Genotyping is important because it provides information as to strain variation and potential association with disease severity. In addition, it is of epidemiologic value because it sheds light on whether prevalent HCV strains are similar to that endemic in a certain region, such as herein in the Middle East.

In comparison with studies made in Iran's neighbor countries, it can be understood that the most common genotype of Yemen, Kuwait, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia is type 4 [12]. However, subtype 1b in Turkey [33] or western border of Iran and subtype 3a in Pakistan or eastern border of Iran are more prevalent [34]. Although genotype 4 is found almost exclusively in Middle East and western countries [35], this genotype is uncommon in our country and related to different route of contamination such as dialysis, minor surgery, piercing or hejamat (see footnote in Table 1), and not to transfusion, intravenous drug abuse (IVDA) or sexual contacts. Another study showed that genotype 4 is over-represented among hemodialysis patients in Tehran [36]. However, we can not rule out any definite conclusion on genotype 4 transmissions with only 2 patients.

On the other hand, subtype 1b is more prevalent in Turkey and Russia [37] (west and north of Iran). This subtype is one of the common genotypes in Iran as the present study and some other limited studies have previously shown [38, 39]. This subtype is more frequently seen in cases with history of hospitalization (17 cases, 60.7%), major surgery (15 cases, 53.6%), dental surgery (12 cases, 42.9%), transfusion (11 cases, 39.3%), alcohol consumption and minor surgery (each one in 8 cases, 28.6%), whereas making 16.7% as a total.

Although the previous studies have had lower sample sizes, their results are similar to our study. They had concluded that subtypes 1a, 3a, and 1b are the most common types respectively and that type 4 is rare [38, 39].

A similarity was observed between our country and both Pakistan (the eastern neighbor of Iran) and India, in which the genotype 3 is very prevalent and genotype 2 is very rare, like in our country [40, 41]. Other studies in Iran have shown the absence of genotype 2 as well [36, 38, 42]. We think that this can be due to the high rate of immigration from these countries to Iran, especially when considering the fact that the prevalence of HCV infection in these countries is higher than Iran. However, more investigations are needed for establishing a definitive judgment.

Genotypes 3a and 1a are more prevalent in IVDU in Europe and USA [2831, 43]. In the present study, 18 (40%) and 17 (37.8%) patients with IVDA had genotype 1a and 3a respectively. It seems that there is a high similarity between the pattern of genotype in IVDU in Europe and United States when compared with Iran. However, it can not be due to migration of these people to these countries because the history of travel abroad was only seen in 6 cases (13.3%).

In the present study, and concerning the route of HCV transmission, most of the patients seem to have multiple routes of contamination which limits the conclusion on relationship between genotype and route of contamination. The inmate route of contamination may be due to IVDA, as it is observed in other countries. However, genotype 3 was more frequent in IVDU. Genotype 4 was also seen only in patients undergoing hemodialysis and/or hejamat.

There was no difference in genotypes in terms of age and sex of the patients. This pattern is different when compared to reports from developed countries, where lifestyles among young adults seem to have influenced the molecular epidemiology of HCV by the introduction of subtype 1a and 3a from USA and Southeast Asia into their young drug addicts [44].

Our results are in accordance with the predominance of genotype 1 observed in most countries worldwide [12, 16, 20, 45, 46]. With respect to the zero frequency of genotype 2, our data differ from those published for patients in the United States, Europe, and even Asia, which showed a different prevalence of genotype 2 [19, 24, 31, 35, 47].

Conclusion

Genotypes 3a and 1a in Iran are less prevalent in IVDU when compared with Europe and USA. Moreover, it seems that there is a high similarity between the pattern of genotype in IVDU in Iran when compared with those in Europe and United States. However, we think that this occurrence can not be due to migration phenomena among involved countries because of history of travel abroad existed only in 6 cases (13.3%).

Materials and methods

We evaluated all the 156 cases with hepatitis C infection (125 male, 31 female; mean age 38.9 ± 1, age range 14–71 years) referred to the Tehran Hepatitis Center from June 2002 to May 2003, consecutively. The diagnosis of chronic hepatitis C was made on the basis of the presence of anti-HCV antibodies in both sera detected by third-generation commercially available enzyme-linked immunosurbent assay (ELISA) kits (ETI HCV K-3, DiaSorin, Spain) and HCV RNA detected qualitatively by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (Amplicore II, Roche, NJ, USA).

CBC, LFT and serum protein electrophoresis were performed, and FBS, TG, and also cholesterol were checked in all patients. These were questioned concerning documented risk factors acting as main infection routes, namely IVDA, blood transfusions, acupuncture or tattoos, extra marital sexual contact, hemodialysis, hemophilia, thalassemia. Other risk factors were also checked.

At the time of the study 89 patients had chronic hepatitis requiring antiviral therapy. Twenty-six cases were cirrhotic and 41 patients did not need treatment. Liver biopsy was performed in 72 patients. Chronic hepatitis was diagnosed in 57 and liver cirrhosis in 12 patients. No specific pathologic change occurred in only 3 patients. The histological finding was further graded according to the HAI of Knodell et al. [34]. The mean HAI score was 8.7 ± 0.6 (range 1–20).

The mean ± standard error (SE) was used for the description of quantitative variables. Whereas the Student t-test and one-way ANOVA were used for comparing quantitative variables, the chi-square test was used for comparisons involving categorical variables. Differences or correlations with P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. SPSS software (Version 11.5, SPSS Inc. Chicago, Illinois, USA) was used for the analysis. The study protocol conforms to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.

For the genotype specific primer approach, viral RNA was extracted from 100 μl of HCV positive patients' serum, using guanidine throcyanate and isopropanol. Precipitated RNA was washed with 70% ethanol and then dissolved in 200 μl TE buffer. Five μl of the dissolved RNA was immediately reverse transcribed by using random hexamer. Genotyping was performed as described previously [32].

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Tehran Hepatitis Center
(2)
Department of Gastroenterology, Baqyiatallah University of Medical Sciences
(3)
Department of Virology, Iran University of Medical Sciences
(4)
Nikan Health Researchers Institute

References

  1. National Institutes of Health consensus Development conference Panel Statement: management of hepatitis C. Hepatology. 1997, 26: 2S-10S. 10.1002/hep.510260701.
  2. National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: hepatitis C fact sheet. [http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/hepatitis/c/fact.htm]
  3. Rosen HR, Martin P: Viral hepatitis in liver transplant recipient. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2000, 3: 761-84. 10.1016/S0891-5520(05)70130-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Alavian SM, Gholami B, Masarrat S: Hepatitis C risk factors in Iranian volunteer blood donors, a case control study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002, 17: 1092-7. 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2002.02843.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Alavian SM, Ardeshiri A, Hajarizadeh B: Seroprevalence of anti-HCV Ab among Iranian hemophilia patients. Transfusion Today. 2001, 49: 4-5.Google Scholar
  6. Alavian SM, Kafaee J, Yektaparast B, Hajarizadeh B, Doroudi T: The efficacy of blood donor screening in reducing the incidence of hepatitis C virus infection among thalassemic patients in Iran. Transfusion Today. 2002, 53: 3-4.Google Scholar
  7. Alavian SM, Einollahi B, Hajarizadeh B, Bakhtiari S, Nafar M, Ahrabi S: Prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection and related risk factors among Iranian hemodialysis patients. Nephrology. 2003, 8: 256-260. 10.1046/j.1440-1797.2003.00166.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Okamoto H, Okada S, Sugiyama Y, Kurai K, Iizuka H, Machida A, Miyakawa Y, Mayumi M: Nucleotide sequence of the genomic RNA of hepatitis C virus isolated from a human carrier: comparison with reported isolates for conserved and divergent regions. J Gen Virol. 1991, 72: 2697-2704.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Okamoto H, Kurai K, Okada S, Yamamoto K, Lizuka H, Tanaka T, Fukuda S, Tsuda F, Mishiro S: Full-length sequence of a hepatitis C virus genome having poor homology to reported isolates: comparative study of fourdistinct genotypes. Virology. 1992, 188: 331-341. 10.1016/0042-6822(92)90762-E.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Houghton M, Weiner A, Han J, Kuo G, Choo QL: Molecular biology of the hepatitis C viruses: implications for diagnosis, development and control of viral disease. Hepatology. 1991, 14: 381-388. 10.1016/0270-9139(91)91430-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Enomoto N, Takada A, Nakao T, Date T: There are two majortypes of hepatitis C virus in Japan. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1990, 170: 1021-1025. 10.1016/0006-291X(90)90494-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Simmonds P, Holmes EC, Cha TA, Chan SW, McOmish F, Irvine B, Beall E, Yap PL, Kolberg J, Urdea MS: Classification of hepatitis C virus into six major genotypes and a series of subtypes by phylogenetic analysis of the NS-5 region. J Gen Virol. 1993, 74: 2391-2399.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Simmonds P, Alberti A, Alter HJ, Bonino F, Bradley DW, Brechot C, Brouwer JT, Chan SW, Chayama K, Chen DS: A proposed system for the nomenclature of hepatitis C viral genotypes. Hepatology. 1994, 9: 1321-1324. 10.1016/0270-9139(94)90887-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Stuyver L, van Arnhem W, Wyseur A, Hernandez F, Delaporte E, Maertens G: Classification of hepatitis C viruses based on phylogenetic analysis of the envelope 1 and nonstructural 5B regions and identification of five additional subtypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994, 91: 10134-10138. 10.1073/pnas.91.21.10134.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Tokita H, Okamoto H, Tsuda F, Song P, Nakata S, Chosa T, Iizuka H, Mishiro S, Miyakawa Y, Mayumi M: Hepatitis C virus variants from Vietnam are classifiable into the seventh, eighth, and ninth major genetic groups. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994, 91: 11022-11026. 10.1073/pnas.91.23.11022.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. McOmish F, Yap PL, Dow BC, Follett EA, Seed C, Keller AJ, Cobain TJ, Krusius T, Kolho E, Naukkarinen R: Geographical distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes in blood donors: an international collaborative survey. J Clin Microbiol. 1994, 32: 884-892.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dusheiko G, Schmilovitz-Weiss H, Brown D, McOmish F, Yap PL, Sherlock S, Sherlock S, McIntyre N, Simmonds P: Hepatitis C virus genotypes: an investigation of type-specific differences in geographic origin and disease. Hepatology. 1994, 19: 13-18. 10.1016/0270-9139(94)90046-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Takada N, Takase S, Takada A, Date T: HCV genotypes in different countries. Lancet. 1992, 339: 808-10.1016/0140-6736(92)91933-Y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Takada N, Takase S, Takada A, Date T: Differences in the hepatitis C virus genotypes in different countries. J Hepatol. 1993, 17: 277-283. 10.1016/S0168-8278(05)80205-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Bukh J, Purcell RH, Miller RH: At least 12 genotypes of hepatitis C virus predicted by sequence analysis of the putative E1 gene of isolates collected worldwide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993, 90: 8234-8238. 10.1073/pnas.90.17.8234.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cha TA, Beall E, Irvine B, Kolberg J, Chien D, Kuo G, Urdea MS: At least five related, but distinct, hepatitis C viral genotypes exist. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89: 7144-7148. 10.1073/pnas.89.15.7144.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chan SW, McOmish F, Holmes EC, Dow B, Peutherer JF, Follett E, Yap PL, Simmonds P: Analysis of a new hepatitis C virus type and its phylogenetic relationship to existing variants. J Gen Virol. 1992, 73: 1131-141.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Simmonds P, McOmish F, Yap PL, Chan SW, Lin CK, Dusheiko G, Saeed AA, Holmes EC: Sequence variability in the 5' non-coding region of hepatitis C virus: identification of a new virus type and restrictions on sequence diversity. J Gen Virol. 1993, 74: 661-668.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Takada N, Takase S, Enomoto N, Takada A, Date T: Clinical backgrounds of the patients having different types of hepatitis C virus genomes. J Hepatol. 1992, 14: 35-40. 10.1016/0168-8278(92)90128-C.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kanai K, Kako M, Okamoto H: HCV genotypes in chronic hepatitis C and response to interferon. Lancet. 1992, 339: 1543-10.1016/0140-6736(92)91311-U.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Yoshioka K, Kakumu S, Wakita T, Ishikawa T, Itoh Y, Takayanagi M, Higashi Y, Shibata M, Morishima T: Detection of hepatitis C virus by polymerase chain reaction and response to interferon-alpha therapy: relationship to genotypes of hepatitis C virus. Hepatology. 1992, 16: 293-299.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Berg T, Konig V, Kuther S, Heuft HG, Wittmann G, Lobeck H, Hopf U: Prognostic relevance of hepatitis C virus genotype for responsiveness to interferon-alpha. Z Gastroenterol. 1995, 33: 426-430.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. McOmish F, Chan SW, Dow BC, Gillon J, Frame WD, Crawford RJ, Yap PL, Follett EA, Simmonds P: Detection of three types of hepatitis C virus in blood donors: investigation of type-specific differences in serologic reactivity and rate of alanine aminotransferase abnormalities. Transfusion. 1993, 33: 7-13. 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1993.33193142314.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Qu D, Li JS, Vitvitski L, Mechai S, Berby F, Tong SP, Bailly F, Wang QS, Martin JL, Trepo C: Hepatitis C virus genotypes in France: comparison of clinical features of patients infected with HCV type I and type II. J Hepatol. 1994, 21: 70-75. 10.1016/S0168-8278(94)80139-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Driesel G, Wirth D, Stark K, Baumgarten R, Sucker U, Schreier E: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype distribution in German isolates: studies on the sequence variability in the E2 and NS5 region. Arch Virol. 1994, 139: 379-388. 10.1007/BF01310799.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pistello M, Maggi F, Vatteroni L, Cecconi N, Panicucci F, Bresci GP, Bailly F, Wang QS, Martin JL, Trepo C: Prevalence of hepatitis C virus genotypes in Italy. J Clin Microbiol. 1994, 32: 232-234.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ohno O, Mizokami M, Wu RR, Saleh MG, Ohba K, Orito E, Mukaide M, Williams R, Lau JY: New hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping system that allows for identification of HCV genotypes 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a, 3b, 4, 5a, and 6a. J Clin Microbiol. 1997, 35: 201-207.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Abacioglu YH, Davidson F, Tuncer S, Yap PL, Ustacelebi S, Yulug N, Simmonds P: The distribution of hepatitis C virus genotypes in Turkish patients. J Viral Hepatol. 1995, 2: 297-301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Shah HA, Jafri W, Malik I, Prescott L, Simmonds P: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes and chronic liver disease in Pakistan. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997, 12: 758-761.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Mellor J, Holmes EC, Jarvis LM, Yap PL, Simmonds P: Investigation of the pattern of hepatitis C virus sequence diversity in different geographical regions: implications for virus classification. J Gen Virol. 1995, 76: 2493-2507.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Samimi-Rad K, Nategh R, Malekzadeh R, Norder H, Magnius L: Molecular epidemiology of hepatitis C virus in Iran as reflected by phylogenetic analysis of the NS5B region. J Med Virol. 2004, 74: 246-252. 10.1002/jmv.20170.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Viazov S, Kuzin S, Paladi N, Tchernovetsky M, Isaeva E, Mazhul L, Vasychova F, Widell A, Roggendorf M: Hepatitis C virus genotypes in different regions of the former Soviet Union (Russia, Belarus, Moldova, and Uzbekistan). J Med Virol. 1997, 53: 36-40. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9071(199709)53:1<36::AID-JMV7>3.0.CO;2-R.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Zali MR, Mayumi M, Raoufi M, Nowroozi A: Hepatitis C virus genotypes in the Islamic Republic of Iran: a preliminary study. East Mediterr Health J. 2000, 6: 372-377.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sawant P, Upadhyay AP, Levicnik-Stezinar S, Zali MR, Okamoto H: Genotypes of GB virus C and hepatitis C virus in hepatitis patients in India, Iran and Slovenia. Hepatol Research. 1998, 10: 175-183. 10.1016/S1386-6346(97)00106-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Khokhar N, Asif N, Khokhar OS: Serotype 3 is most common hepatitis C serotype in Pakistan: however, significant numbers are untypeable. Hepatology. 2003, 38: 270-271. 10.1053/jhep.2003.50260.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Chowdhury A, Santra A, Chaudhuri S, Dhali GK, Chaudhuri S, Maity SG, Naik TN, Bhattacharya SK, Mazumder DN: Hepatitis C virus infection in the general population: a community-based study in West Bengal, India. Hepatology. 2003, 37: 802-809. 10.1053/jhep.2003.50157.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Elahi E, Pourmand N, Chaung R, Rofoogaran A, Boisver J, Samimi-Rad K, Davis RW, Ronaghi M: Determination of hepatitis C virus genotype by Pyrosequencing. J Virol Methods. 2003, 109: 171-176. 10.1016/S0166-0934(03)00068-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Pawlotsky JM, Tsakiris L, Roudot-Thoraval F, Pellet C, Stuyver L, Duval J, Dhumeaux D: Relationship between hepatitis C virus genotypes and sources of infection in patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Infect Dis. 1995, 171: 1607-1610.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Dal Molin G, Ansaldi F, Biagi C, D'agaro P, Comar M, Croce L, Tiribelli C, Campello C: Changing molecular epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection in Northeast Italy. J Med Virol. 2002, 68: 352-356. 10.1002/jmv.10210.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Simmonds P: Variability of hepatitis C virus. Hepatology. 1995, 21: 570-583. 10.1016/0270-9139(95)90121-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Viazov S, Zibert A, Ramakrishnan K, Widell A, Cavicchini A, Schreier E, Roggendorf M: Typing of hepatitis C virus isolates by DNA enzyme immunoassay. Virol Methods. 1994, 48: 81-91. 10.1016/0166-0934(94)90091-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Davis GL: Hepatitis C virus genotypes and quasispecies. Am J Med. 1999, 107: 21S-26S. 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)00376-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kabir et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement