Open Access

Chlamydia trachomatisgrowth inhibition and restoration of LDL-receptor level in HepG2 cells treated with mevastatin

  • Yuriy K Bashmakov1Email author,
  • Nailya A Zigangirova1, 2,
  • Yulia P Pashko2,
  • Lidia N Kapotina2 and
  • Ivan M Petyaev1
Contributed equally
Comparative Hepatology20109:3

DOI: 10.1186/1476-5926-9-3

Received: 1 July 2009

Accepted: 28 January 2010

Published: 28 January 2010

Abstract

Background

Perihepatitis is rare but consistently occurring extragenital manifestation of untreated Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Despite of possible liver involvement in generalized C. trachomatis infection, the ability of the pathogen to propagate in the hepatic cells and its impact on liver functions is not thoroughly investigated. The effect of mevastatin, an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase, on C. trachomatis growth in human hepatoma cell line HepG2 has been studied. Bacterial growth was assessed by immunostaining with FITC-labeled monoclonal antibody against chlamydial lipopolysaccharide and by RT-PCR for two chlamydial genetic markers (16S rRNA and euo).

Results

Chlamydial inclusion bodies were seen in approximately 50% of hepatocytes at 48 hours in the post infection period. Lysates obtained from infected hepatocytes were positive in the infective progeny test at 48 and especially in 72 hours after infection initiation. It has been shown that chlamydial infection in hepatocytes also leads to the decline of LDL-receptor mRNA which reflects infection multiplicity rate. Additions of mevastatin (1, 20 and 40 μM) 1 hour before inoculation restored and upregulated LDL-receptor mRNA level in a dose-dependent manner. Mevastatin treatment had no effect on internalization of chlamydial particles. However it reduced drastically the number of chlamydial 16S rRNA and euo transcripts as well as overall infection rate in HepG-2 cells. Complete eradication of infection has been seen by immunofluorescent staining at 40 μM mevastatin concentration, when expression level of chlamydial 16S rRNA and euo was undetectable. Lower concentration of mevastatin (20 μM) promoted euo expression level and the appearance of atypically small chlamydial inclusions, while there was a noticeable reduction in the number of infected cells and 16S rRNA transcripts.

Conclusions

C. trachomatis can efficiently propagate in hepatocytes affecting transcription rate of some liver-specific genes. Ongoing cholesterol synthesis is essential for chlamydial growth in hepatocytes. Inhibitors of cholesterol biosynthesis can supplement conventional strategy in the management of C. trachomatis infection.

Background

Chlamydia trachomatis is a prevalent bacterial pathogen causing most of the cases of urogenital infections and preventable blindness in the world. Epididymitis and urethritis in men, cervical as well as the urethral inflammation in woman may lead to acute pelvic inflammatory disease and variety of other extragenital manifestations in both sexes. Among most frequent extragenital manifestations of C. trachomatis are sexually acquired reactive arthritis (SARA), conjunctivitis and perihepatitis [1]. In most of the cases of ophthalmological manifestations C. trachomatis can be detected and/or isolated in the eye swabs [2]. It is believed that immunological and hormonal phenotype as well as some genotype characteristics, particularly expression of human leucocyte antigen B27, predetermine the severity of extragenital manifestations caused by C. trachomatis [3]. Delayed cell-mediated immunological response is also known to play an important role in the systemic generalization of chlamydial disease [4].

However there is a growing body of evidence that C. trachomatis can be present and isolated from extragenital tissues and organs. Bacterial antigens, DNA and/or RNA can be detected in whole blood [5, 6] since C. trachomatis can efficiently propagate in mononuclear cells [7] as well as in astrocytes [8], muscle cells [9] and myocardiocytes [10]. Virulent forms of C. trachomatis can be isolated from synovial exudate [11], ascitic fluid [12, 13], liver biopsy material [14], and respiratory secretion fluids [15]. Similar pattern of extragenital manifestations has been reported in animal experiments.

Lesions containing virulent C. trachomatis have been reported in lungs, liver and spleen of BALB/c mice in the post-infection period [16]. With the exception of a single report [14] there are no confirmed cases of C. trachomatis isolation from the human liver or any well articulated insights on the potential role of chlamydial infection in hepatobilliary pathology. However, recently shown ability of C. trachomatis to propagate in hepatocytes [17, 18] leads to many questions about possible involvement of liver in systemic chlamydial disease.

In the present paper we have investigated the infectability of C. trachomatis toward immortalized human hepatoma cells (HepG2 cell line) and some metabolic consequences of chlamydia propagation in the hepatic cell line. In particular, of mRNA regulation of major lipogenic genes in the host cells and effect of mevastatin, an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl CoA reductase (HMG-CoA reductase), in cases of chlamydial infection in HepG2 cells are reported below.

Methods

Reagents

All reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich unless specifically mentioned otherwise. HepG2 and Hep2 cells were obtained from "European Collection of Cell Cultures" (Salisbury, UK).

Cell culture and organisms

HepG2 cells were cultured in 5% CO2 in DMEM supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) and 2 mM glutamine. Cells were grown in 6, 24, and 96 well plates until confluence rate of 80% was reached. Addition of mevastatin at concentrations ranging from 1 μM to 40 μM was done 1 hour before inoculation of C. trachomatis. Strain L2/Bu434 of C. trachomatis was kindly provided by Dr. P. Saikku (University of Oulu, Finland). Chlamydial strains were initially propagated in Hep2 cells and purified by Renografin gradient centrifugation as described [19]. Chlamydial titers were determined by infecting Hep2 cells with 10-fold dilutions of thawed stock suspension. Purified elementary bodies (EB) with known titer were suspended in sucrose-phosphate-glutamic acid buffer [19] and used as inoculums for HepG2 cells.

HepG2 plates were infected with C. trachomatis at multiplicities of infection (MOI) of 1 or 2 in DMEM with 0.4% glucose without FBS and cycloheximide and centrifuged for 0.5 hour at 1500 g. The cells were harvested for RNA analysis in 24 hours (expression of chlamydial genes) and in 48 hours (expression of eukaryotic genes and immunofluorescence analysis) after infection after the inoculation of C. trachomatis. Acell viability assay was conducted routinely for each group of the experiment using 2% trypan blue exclusion test. The cell monolayers with viability > 85% were used for RNA extraction and/or immunostaining. There was a significant decrease in number of viable hepatocytes during the late stage of chlamydial infection in HepG2 cells (72 hours).

Immunofluoresence staining

Infected HepG2 monolayers grown 48 hours on coverslips in 24 well plates, which were fixed with methanol. Permeabilized cells were stained by direct immunofluorescence using FITC - conjugated monoclonal antibody against chlamydial lipopolysaccharide (NearMedic Plus, RF). Inclusion-containing cells were visualized using Nikon Eclipse 50 i microscope fluorescence microscope at X1350 magnification.

Internalization assay

Internalization assay has been performed as described [20]. Briefly, to visualize attachment of C. trachomatis to HepG2 cells, elementary bodies (EB) of C. trachomatis were added at MOI 50 to the 24 well plates with coverslips containing hepatocytes monolayers. The EB were allowed to attach in presence or absence of 40 μM mevastatin for 60 min at 4°C after which the inoculum was removed, cell were washed 3 times with ice-cold PBS. To visualize attached particles, the cell monolayers were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min on ice. This regimen of fixation is believed to maintain the integrity of the plasma membrane in the host cells [20]. After fixation the cells were washed with PBS and incubated for 30 min with monoclonal chlamydial LPS-specific antibody labeled with FITC (1 μg/ml, NearMedic Plus, RF) for visualization of attached particles. Internalization has been studied in separate set of experiments. To allow attachment, HepG2 cells were incubated with EB of C. trachomatis in presence or absence of 40 μM mevastatin for 1 hour at 4°C after which the inoculum was removed and the cells were washed 3 times with ice-cold PBS. The cells were transferred to 37°C for 1 hour to permit internalization. After fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde (15 min, room temperature) the cells were incubated for 30 min with the polyclonal antibody raised against EB of C. trachomatis (Gamaleya Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Moscow, RF). This step was performed in order to block attachment sites of non-internalized EB. After fixation with methanol (15 min, room temperature), which allows penetration of antibody inside of the cells [20], cell monolayers were incubated for 30 min with 1 μg/ml of monoclonal FITC-conjugated antibody against C. trachomatis major outer membrane protein (MOMP) (NearMedic Plus, RF). The cells were washed thoroughly with PBS and analyzed by immunofluorescent microscope.

Assessment of infective progeny

In order to assess the infective progeny accumulation in HepG2 cells after 48 hour cultivation period, HepG2 cells were harvested, frozen and thawed, as described elsewhere. Serial dilutions of lysates were inoculated onto Hep-2 cells and centrifuged for 0.5 hour at 1500 g. The infected cells were visualized with C. trachomatis LPS-specific antibody in 48 hours of the post-infection period.

RNA extraction and reverse transcription

RNA was isolated from HepG2 monolayers grown on 6-well plates using TRIZol (Invitrogen). Total mRNA pretreated with DNase I (DNA-free™, Ambion) and quantified on the spectrophotometer NanoDrop ND-100 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Wilmington, USA) was converted into cDNA using random hexamer primers and a SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany).

Quantitative real-time PCR

The mRNA levels for two different developmental genes of C. trachomatis were analyzed in HepG2 cells by quantitative RT-PCR using thermocycler ANK 32 (Syntol, RF). The 16S rRNA and gene encoding DNA-binding protein Euo were studied as constitutive markers of the early stage of chlamydial developmental cycle. Primers for C. trachomatis 16S rRNA (sense - 5'-GGCGTATTTGGGCATCCGAGTAACG-3', antisense - 5'-TCAAATCCAGCGGGTATTAACCGCCT-3') and C. trachomatis Euo (sense - 5'-TCCCCGACGCTCTCCTTTCA-3', antisense - 5'-CTCGTCAGGCTATCTATGTTGCT-3') were verified and used under thermal cycling conditions - 95°C for 10 min and 50 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds, 60°C for 1 min and 72°C for 20 seconds. Serial dilutions of C. trachomatis RNA, extracted from chlamydia-infected Hep-2 cells, were used as a standard for quantification of chlamydial gene expression. The results of PCR analysis for chlamydia-specific genes were normalized to mRNA values of human beta actin (β-actin, primers: sense - 5'-GCACCCAGCACAATGAAGAT-3', antisense - 5'-GCCGATCCACACGGAGTAC-3'). Among other human-specific genes studied were major lipogenic enzymes: 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl CoA reductase (HMG CoA reductase, primers: sense-5'-CAAGGAGCATGCAAAGATAATCC-3' antisense -5'-GCCATTACGGTCC CACACA-3'); 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl CoA synthase (HMG CoA Syn, primers: sense - 5'-GACTTGTGCATTCAAACATAGCAA-3', antisense - 5'-GCTGTAGCAGGGAGTCTTGGTACT-3'); squalene synthase (SS, primers: sense - 5'-ATGACCATCAGTGTGGAAAAGAAG-3', antisense - 5'-CCGCCAGTCTGGTTGGTAA-3'); and fatty acid synthase (FAS, primers: sense-5'-TCGTGGGCTACAGCATGGT-3', antisense - 5'-GCCCTCTGAAGTCGAAGAAGAA-3').

The mRNA levels for lipogenic enzymes as well as mRNAs for LDL-receptor (LDL-R, primers: sense - 5'-GGCTGCGTTAATGTGACACTCT-3', antisense - 5'-CTCTAGCCATGTT GCAGACTTTGT-3') and LDL-receptor related protein (LRP, primers: - 5'-CCTACTGGACGCTGA CTTTGC-3' antisense - 5'-GGCCCCCCATGTAGAGTGT-3') in the host cells were normalized to human β-actin expression level. The mRNA expression levels in the host cells were referenced to the CT values in uninfected HepG2 cells grown at the same conditions. That reference value was taken as 1.00. Each cDNA sample was tested by PCR at least three times. All experiments were repeated at least twice. Representative sets of results are shown below.

Results

C. trachomatisgrowth in HepG2 cells

Immunofluorescent images of HepG2 infected cells reveal that C. trachomatis can efficiently grow in immortalized hepatocytes cells line. Positive immunofluorescence was first apparent within 24 hours of post-infection period and did not differ in intensity at MOIs of 1 and 2. Inclusion bodies were seen in about 50% of cells at 48 hours in the post-infection period at MOI of 1. Up to 70% of the infected cells were seen at multiplicity rate of 2. Most of the immunostaining was localized throughout whole cytoplasm. However some cells had perinuclear pattern of immunofluorescence with no intranuclear inclusions seen. At 48 and especially 72 hours of the post-infection period, immunostaining was stronger with numerous inclusion bodies. Some of them were released from the ruptured cells. To determine if C. trachomatis can be cultured from HepG2 monolayers, we harvested 24 and 48 hour cultures of hepatocytes. Replication was not observed when 24 hour lysates of hepatocytes were inoculated to Hep2 cells. However the lysates obtained in 48 and especially 72 hour were positive in the infective progeny test.

LDL-receptor mRNA and multiplicity of infection

As can be seen from Table 1, 48 hour propagation of C. trachomatis in HepG2 cells did not affect mRNA for a major housekeeping gene - 36B4, nor mRNAs for lipogenic enzymes. However, there is dose-dependent decline in LDL-receptor mRNA, reflecting multiplicity infection level. LDL-receptor related protein mRNA remained unchanged.
Table 1

Folds and mRNA changes in HepG2 cells infected with C. trachomatis at different infectivity rates.

Parameter

Non-infected cells

Infected cells

  

MOI 1

MOI2

36B4ct

18.37

18.26

18.01

HMG-CoA Red

1

1.31

0.98

HMG-CoA Synth

1

1.06

0.87

SS

1

1.21

0.89

LDL-R

1

0.76

0.56

LRP

1

0.87

0.99

FAS

1

0.88

0.89

HepG2 cells were set up, grown and infected with C. trachomatis in presence or absence of mevastatin as described in Methods. RNA was extracted in 48 hours after inoculation of the bacteria. RNA levels for the genes of interest were normalized to 36B4 expression level, whose CT values are represented in the upper row of the Table. All RNA values in the infected cells are referenced to non-infected control

Mevastatin reverses LDL-receptor mRNA decline

Inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase are the most powerful activators of LDL receptor, whose activity on the LDL-receptor is mediated by SREBP pathway [21]. The addition of mevastatin to HepG2 cells infected with C. trachomatis at MOI of 1 did not affect cell viability nor mRNA levels of 36B4 (Table 2). However, LDL-receptor mRNA level was dose-dependently upregulated with the increasing concentrations of mevastatin, reaching 2 fold induction at 40 μM level. This effect was even more pronounced at 72 hours of the post-infection period though cell viability was declining (results not shown). There is also dose-dependent upregulation of cholesterologenic enzymes (HMG-CoA reductase, HMG-CoA synthase, SS) which is well known effect of statins in the cultures cells [22]. Notably, LDL-receptor related protein mRNA was not impacted under all conditions studied.
Table 2

Folds and mRNA changes in C. trachomatis-infected HepG2 cells after addition of mevastatin.

  

Infected cells -- Addition of mevastatin

Parameter

Non-infected cells

0 μM

1 μM

20 μM

40 μM

36B4ct

16.94

17.04

16.94

16.98

17.01

HMG-CoA Red

1

1.06

1.17

1.7

1.81

HMG-CoA Synth

1

0.79

1.46

1.53

1.89

SS

1

0.87

1.27

1.54

1.73

LDL-R

1

0.69

1.38

1.63

2.08

LRP

1

1.09

0.85

0.91

0.99

FAS

1

0.95

0.92

0.89

0.96

HepG2 cells were set up, grown and infected with C. trachomatis in presence or absence of mevastatin as described in Methods. RNA was extracted in 48 hours after inoculation of the bacteria. RNA levels for the genes of interest were normalized to 36B4 expression level, whose CT values are represented in the upper row of the Table. All RNA values in the infected cells are referenced to non-infected control.

Mevastatin inhibits chlamydial growth in HepG2 cells

Figure 1 shows representative immunofluorescent images of HepG2 cells infected with C. trachomatis in presence of increasing concentrations of mevastatin. As can be seen, the effect of mevastatin was marginal at the concentration of 1 μM, though some decline in the number of infected cells has been noticed. However, 20 μM mevastatin reduced both the number of inclusion bodies in the infected cells, promoting a perinuclear pattern of staining. Mevastatin-treated cells (20 μM) appeared to contain smaller inclusion bodies similar to those that occur during persistent chlamydial infection [23]. The highest concentration of mevastatin tested (40 μM) abolished the number of infected cells almost completely. Analysis of bacterial transcripts showed a similar tendency. As can be seen from Figure 2, 16S rRNA and euo mRNA were undetectable at highest concentration of mevastatin used, whereas at 20 μM and 1 μM mevastatin reduced the expression level for 16S rRNA by 8 and 3 fold respectively. There is significant induction of euo mRNA at 20 μM mevastatin concentration.
Figure 1

Immunofluorescent images of HepG2 cells infected with C. trachomatis in presence of mevastatin. HepG2 cells were set up, grown and infected with C. trachomatis in presence or absence of mevastatin as described in Methods. Immunofluorescence analysis was performed 48 hours after inoculation of the pathogen. A - non-infected cells; B -- infected cells with no mevastatin; C -- infected cells in presence of 1 μM mevastatin: D -- infected cells in presence of 20 μM mevastatin; E -- infected cells in presence of 40 μM mevastatin. Scale bar = 10 μm.

Figure 2

Expression of chlamydial 16S RNA and euo in infected hepatocytes grown at different concentration of mevastatin. HepG2 cells were set up, grown and infected with C. trachomatis in presence or absence of mevastatin as described in Methods. RNA was extracted in 24 hours after inoculation of the bacteria. Expression of chlamydial genes was normalized to copy number of eukaryotic β-actin.

Inhibition of chlamydial growth in cultured cells in presence of mevastatin may take place due to abnormal internalization of chlamydial particles, since the entry of chlamydial particles into mammalian cells requires interaction of pathogens with lipid rafts of plasma membrane [24]. Therefore, we next investigated the internalization rate of chlamydial particles into HepG2 cells in presence of 40 μM mevastatin. As can be seen from Figure 3, HepG2 cells treated with 40 μM mevastatin have similar number of chlamydial particles attached to the plasma membrane when compared to untreated control cells. Mevastatin treatment did not affect the number of internalized particles as well (results not shown).
Figure 3

Attachment of chlamydial particles to plasma membrane of hepatocytes in presence or absence of mevastatin. HepG2 cells were set up, grown and incubated with chlamydial particles (EB) in presence or absence of mevastatin as described in Methods. Attached particles were visualized with FITC-labeled antibody against chlamydial LPS. A -- attachment of chlamydial particles in absence of 40 μM mevastatin: B -- attachment of chlamydial particles in presence of 40 μM mevastatin. Scale bar = 10 μm.

Discussion

Although there is a small but growing body of evidence that C. trachomatis can be disseminated widely throughout the human body, the physiological consequences and overall medical relevance of extragenital propagation of C. trachomatis remains poorly understood. First of all, our results confirm initial observations [25] showing the ability of C. trachomatis to propagate in HepG2 hepatoma cell line. More importantly, we have demonstrated that propagation of C. trachomatis in hepatocytes follows full infectious cycle leading to the formation of infectious progeny in 48 and 72 hours of post-infection period. Propagation of the pathogen distinctively affects some specific functions of the liver cells. In particular, C.trachomatis ameliorates transcription of LDL-receptor in hepatocytes, which may have various consequences for lipid homeostasis.

Chlamydial organisms are strict intracellular parasites, whose requirements in the metabolites are covered by the host cells. Enhanced uptake of the substrates and metabolites by the infected host cells is a well known "signature" strategy of chlamydial infection mandatory for successful accomplishment of its infectious cycle [25]. However, in the case of the chlamydial growth in HepG2 cells we have seen significant decline in LDL-receptor mRNA, which may potentially result in the reduction of lipid uptake. The biological significance of this finding remains unclear. However it is possible to assume, that decline in the LDL-receptor mRNA might represent a mechanism of metabolic adaption of the host cell to chlamydial infection targeted on limitation of lipid supply and chlamydial growth in the cells. Unfortunately we were not able to document corresponding changes in LDL-receptor protein level due to decline in number of viable HepG2 cells that occurs at 72 hour time point of post-infection period. Models of persistent chlamydial infection might be required for evaluating hepatic LDL-receptor turnover in the infected liver cells.

Secondly, we have clearly shown that mevastatin, an inhibitor of cholesterol biosynthesis, restores LDL-receptor mRNA and has a significant anti-chlamydial activity reducing chlamydial growth in infected hepatocytes. Genome of C. trachomatis does not contain genes responsible for lipid biosynthesis. Chlamydial species are known to acquire cholesterol, fatty acids and triglycerides from the host cells [26]. Therefore, it was reasonable to believe that targeting the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway in the host cells might affect chlamydial infection rate. This prediction was confirmed by RT PCR analysis. It is well acknowledged, that C. trachomatis 16S rRNA gene expression is an informative criterion of chlamydial developmental cycle expressed in both early and late stages of C. trachomatis infection [27]. Detection of 16S rRNA transcript as a marker of viable and metabolically active Chlamydia allows to evaluate the effectiveness of different antibacterial agents [28]. Maximum inhibition of 16S rRNA as well as drastic reduction in the number of infected immunofluorescence-positive cell has been seen at 40 μM mevastatin level. Less pronounced decline in 16S rRNA transcript level has been observed at 20 μM mevastatin concentration. Even though addition of 20 μM mevastatin did not result in complete inhibition of chlamydial growth in HepG2 cells, there was formation of smaller chlamydial inclusions. Those are often observed in antibiotic- and/or cytokine-treated cells when concentration of the agent is not enough to induce complete eradication of the pathogen [23]. "Aberrant" chlamydial cells are known to have some metabolic activity but fail to induce new rounds of chlamydial infection [23, 28]. Therefore inhibition of chlamydial growth in mevastatin-treated HepG2 cells takes place in clearly dose-dependent manner. Step-wise decline in 16S rRNA level was accompanied by reduction in the number of infected cells (1 and 20 μM mevastatin), as well as the appearance of "aberrant" chlamydial forms (20 μM mevastatin) until complete eradication of chlamydial growth takes place (40 μM mevastatin). Euo mRNA level has been changing in a similar manner, except inconsistent increase seen at 20 μM concentration of mevastatin. However, it is known that euo mRNA can be highly induced when the developmental cycle of C. trachomatis in cultured cells is compromised by addition of cytokines and other substances affecting chlamydial growth [28]. It has been proposed, that increased expression of euo may inhibit transcription of the genes specific for "late phase" of chlamydial developmental cycle [28, 29]. Thus, enhanced transcription rate of euo may represent self-sufficient mechanism predetermining anti-chlamydial activity of mevastatin.

It is also important to conclude, that according to our results mevastatin has no effect on initial interaction of chlamydial particles with host cell, allowing the entry of the pathogen into hepatocytes. Therefore we assume that later stages of chlamydial developmental cycle are affected by mevastatin treatment. The effect of different metabolites and inhibitors of mevalonate pathway needs to be tested in hepatocytes infected with C. trachomatis in presence of mevastatin. It is possible, that anti-chlamydial activity of mevastatin takes place due to reduced geranylgeranylation of host cell proteins as it happens in case of lovastatin-treated hepatocytes infected with hepatitis C virus [30].

Conclusions

We have demonstrated that ongoing cholesterol synthesis is essential for chlamydial growth in hepatocytes. Although the precise mechanism of anti-chlamydial activity of mevastatin remains to be elucidated, targeting the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway may represent an effective strategy in management of chlamydial infection.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Ms Agni Roce is appreciated for invaluable help during experimental work and manuscript preparation.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Cambridge Theranostics Ltd
(2)
Department of Medical Microbiology, Institute of Epidemiology and Microbiology RAMS

References

  1. Baguley S, Greenhouse P: Non-genital manifestations of Chlamydia trachomatis. Clinical Medicine. 2003, 3: 206-208.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Yang JL, Hong KC, Schachter J, Moncada J, Lekew T, House JI, Zhou Z, Neuwelt MD, Rutar T, Halfpenny C, Shah N, Whitcher JP, Lietman TM: Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis ocular infection in trachoma-endemic communities by rRNA amplification. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009, 50: 90-94. 10.1167/iovs.08-2247.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kobayashi S, Kida I: Reactive arthritis: recent advances and clinical manifestations. Intern Med. 2005, 44: 408-412. 10.2169/internalmedicine.44.408.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bilenki L, Wang S, Yang J, Fan Y, Joyee AG, Yang X: Chlamydia trachomatis NK T cell activation promotes infection in vivo. J Immunol. 2005, 175: 3197-3206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Roubalova K: A simultaneous detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae and Chlamydia trachomatis DNA by real-time PCR. Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2007, 56: 166-173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Nasution TA, Cheong SF, Lim CT, Leong EW, Ngeow YF: Multiplex PCR for the detection of urogenital pathogens in mothers and newborns. Malays J Pathol. 2007, 29: 19-24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Schrader S, Klos A, Hess S, Zeidler H, Kuipers JG, Rihl M: Expression of inflammatory host genes in Chlamydia trachomatis-infected human monocytes. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007, 9: R54-10.1186/ar2209.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dreses-Werringloer U, Gérard HC, Whittum-Hudson JA, Hudson AP: Chlamydophila (Chlamydia) pneumoniae infection of human astrocytes and microglia in culture displays an active, rather than a persistent, phenotype. Am J Med Sci. 2006, 332: 168-174. 10.1097/00000441-200610000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Yang X, Coriolan D, Schultz K, Golenbock DT, Beasley D: Toll-like receptor 2 mediates persistent chemokine release by Chlamydia pneumoniae-infected vascular smooth muscle cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005, 25: 2308-2314. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000187468.00675.a3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Wang G, Burczynski F, Hasinoff B, Zhong G: Infection of myocytes with Chlamydiae. Microbiology. 2002, 148: 3955-3959.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rihl M, Köhler L, Klos A, Zeidler H: Persistent infection of Chlamydia in reactive arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006, 65: 281-284. 10.1136/ard.2005.044966.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Shabot JM, Roak GD, Truant AL: Chlamydia trachomatis in the ascitic fluids of patients with chronic liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 1983, 78: 291-294.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Shabot AM: Chlamydia trachomatis and ascites: Going with the flow?. Hepatology. 2005, 9: 505-506. 10.1002/hep.1840090328.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Dan M, Tyrrell LDJ, Goldsand G: Isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from the liver of patients with prolonged fever. Gut. 1987, 28: 1514-1516. 10.1136/gut.28.11.1514.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen CJ, Wu KG, Tang RB, Yuan HC, Soong WJ, Hwang BT: Characteristics of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in hospitalized infants with lower respiratory tract infection. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2007, 40: 255-259.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Barteneva N, Theodor I, Peterson EM, de la Maza LM: Role of neutrophils in controlling early stages of a Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Infect Immun. 1996, 64: 4830-4833.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hatch GM, McClarty G: C.trachomatis-infection accelerates metabolism of phosphatidylcholinederived from low density lipoproteins but does not affect phosphatidylcholine secretion from hepatocytes. BMC Microbiology. 2004, 4: 8-10.1186/1471-2180-4-8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang G, Burczynski F, Anderson J, Zhong G: Effect of host fatty acid-binding protein and fatty acid uptake on growth of Chlamydia trachomatis L2. Microbiology. 2007, 153: 1935-1939. 10.1099/mic.0.2006/003491-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Galdwell HD, Kromhout J, Schachter J: Purification and partial charachterization of the major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia trachomatis. Infect Immun. 1981, 31: 1161-1176.Google Scholar
  20. Carabeo RA, Grieshaber SS, Fisher E, Hackstadt T: Chlamydia trachomatis induces remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton during attachment and entry into HeLa cells. Infect Immun. 2002, 70: 3793-3803. 10.1128/IAI.70.7.3793-3803.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldstein JL, Brown MS: The LDL receptor. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2009, 29: 431-8. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179564.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Medina MW, Gao F, Ruan W, Rotter JI, Krauss RM: Alternative splicing of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase is associated with plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol response to simvastatin. Circulation. 2008, 118: 355-362. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.773267.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hammerschlag MR: The intracellular life of chlamydiae. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis. 2002, 13: 239-248. 10.1053/spid.2002.127201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Stuart ES, Webley WC, Norkin LC: Lipid rafts, caveolae, caveolin-1, and entry by Chlamydiae into host cells. Exp Cell Res. 2003, 287: 67-78. 10.1016/S0014-4827(03)00059-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang G, Burczynski F, Anderson J, Zhong G: Effect of host fatty acid-binding protein and fatty acid uptake on growth of Chlamydia trachomatis L2. Microbiology. 2007, 153: 1935-1939. 10.1099/mic.0.2006/003491-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumar Y, Cocchiaro J, Valdivia RH: The obligate intracellular pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis targets host lipid droplets. Curr Biol. 2006, 16: 1646-1651. 10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.060.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Belland RJ, Zhong G, Crane DD, Hogan D, Sturdevant D, Sharma J, Beatty WL, Caldwell HD: Genomic transcriptional profiling of the developmental cycle of Chlamydia trachomatis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 8478-8483. 10.1073/pnas.1331135100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Perry LL, Su H, Feilzer K, Messer R, Hughes S, Whitmire W, Caldwell HD: Differential sensitivity of distinct Chlamydia trachomatis isolates to IFN-gamma-mediated inhibition. J Immunol. 1999, 162: 3541-3548.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang L, Douglas AL, Hatch TP: Characterization of a Chlamydia psittaci DNA binding protein (EUO) synthesized during the early and middle phases of the developmental cycle. Infect Immun. 1998, 66: 1167-1173.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ye J, Wang C, Sumpter R, Brown MS, Goldstein JL, Gale M: Disruption of hepatitis C virus RNA replication through inhibition of host protein geranylgeranylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 15865-15870. 10.1073/pnas.2237238100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Bashmakov et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement