Open Access

The role of ATP and adenosine in the control of hepatic blood flow in the rabbit liver in vivo

  • Dominic J Browse1,
  • Robert T Mathie2,
  • Irving S Benjamin1 and
  • Barry Alexander1Email author
Comparative Hepatology20032:9

DOI: 10.1186/1476-5926-2-9

Received: 15 July 2003

Accepted: 26 November 2003

Published: 26 November 2003

Abstract

Background

The role of adenosine and ATP in the regulation of hepatic arterial blood flow in the "buffer response" was studied in vitro and in a new in vivo model in the rabbit. The model achieves portal-systemic diversion by insertion of a silicone rubber prosthesis between the portal vein and inferior vena cava and avoids alterations in systemic haemodynamics.

Results

Hepatic arterial (HA) blood flow increased in response to reduced portal venous (PV) blood flow, the "buffer response", from 19.4 (3.3) ml min-1 100 g-1 to 25.6 (4.3) ml min-1 100 g-1 (mean (SE), p < 0.05, Student's paired t-test). This represented a buffering capacity of 18.7 (5.2) %. Intra-portal injections of ATP or adenosine (1 micrograms kg-1-0.5 mg kg-1) elicited immediate increases in HA blood flow to give -log ED50 values of 2.0 and 1.7 mg kg-1 for ATP and adenosine respectively. Injection of ATP and adenosine had no measurable effect on PV flow. In vitro, using an isolated dual-perfused rabbit liver preparation, the addition of 8-phenyltheophylline (10 MicroMolar) to the HA and PV perfusate significantly inhibited the HA response to intra-arterial adenosine and to mid-range doses of intra-portal or intra-arterial ATP (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

It is suggested that HA vasodilatation elicited by ATP may be partially mediated through activation of P1-purinoceptors following catabolism of ATP to adenosine.

Background

The hepatic arterial (HA) hyperaemic response to portal vein (PV) occlusion, the hepatic arterial "buffer response" [1], is thought to be mediated by adenosine. Studies conducted in the cat demonstrated both inhibition of the buffer response by the adenosine receptor antagonist, 8-phenyltheophylline, and potentiation by the adenosine uptake inhibitor dipyridamole [2]. Further studies however, suggested that adenosine was not the sole agent responsible in the dog and other species [36].

Adenosine-5'-triphosphate (ATP) has been proposed to play an important role in the control of systemic [7, 8] and hepatic vascular tone [9] and may therefore be a candidate for a role in the buffer response. ATP has been shown to be released from blood constituents [10] and vascular endothelium [11, 12] during hypoxia [13] or altered flow conditions [14] which may be encountered during reduction or total occlusion of portal venous blood flow.

Defined criteria have been proposed which must be fulfilled for a substance to be considered as a regulator of the buffer response [2]. These included: 1) the substance must dilate the hepatic artery; 2) substances in portal blood must have access to hepatic arterial resistance sites; 3) potentiators of the substance should also potentiate the buffer response; and 4) inhibitors of the substance should inhibit the buffer response. ATP has been shown to dilate the isolated hepatic artery [15] and the hepatic arterial vascular bed of the rabbit in vitro [9] and has been shown to act via the release of nitric oxide (NO) [16]. A similar mechanism is at least partly responsible for the hepatic arterial vasodilatation seen following portal venous injection of ATP in the same model [17]. In most vessels, ATP has been shown to elicit vasodilatation by stimulation of purinergic P2y receptors, generally located in the vascular endothelium [9] although they may also be on HA vascular smooth muscle in the rabbit [15]. In some vessels however, ATP, which is rapidly catabolised to adenosine-5'-diphosphate (ADP), adenosine-5'-monophosphate (AMP) and adenosine in endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells [18], causes vasodilatation via P1-purinoceptors [19]. Total catabolism of ATP to ADP, AMP or adenosine would therefore raise the possibility that all previous findings relating to the buffer response were consistent with release of ATP alone. However, this mechanism of action of ATP is not believed to occur in the rabbit liver [9].

In vivo studies are required to confirm whether ATP is involved in the generation of the buffer response because it cannot be demonstrated in the in vitro perfused rabbit liver (Browse and Alexander, unpublished observation). In addition, current Home Office restrictions and economical factors which influence the use of larger animal models for experimentation has restricted in vivo studies in the UK although a feasibility study conducted in the Asian hybrid minipig in our laboratories proved unsuccessful [4]. The purpose of the present study therefore, was to develop an in vivo model for the assessment of liver blood flow in the rabbit to compare with our in vitro dual-perfused rabbit liver model [20] in order to establish whether ATP is involved in the generation of the buffer response.

Results

In vivo

In a number of experiments irreversible hypotension (n = 2), respiratory depression (n = 2) and acidosis (n = 2) occurred during the temporary occlusion of the portal vein for the insertion of the mesocaval shunt and data from these preparations have therefore not been included. It was imperative that haemodynamic stability should be attained before measurements were conducted and this was achieved in 5 preparations presented here. HA flow (HAF) was 19.4 (3.3) ml min-1 100 g-1, PV flow (PVF) 85.5 (19.3) ml min-1 100 g-1 and mean arterial pressure was 80.2 (5.8) mmHg. When the mesocaval shunt was opened and the mesenteric vein occluded PVF decreased to 38.5 (3.7) ml min-1 100 g-1 and HAF increased to 25.6 (4.3) ml min-1100 g-1 (p < 0.05, Figure 2a) a calculated buffering capacity of 18.7 (5.2) % (Table 1, n = 5). During portal venous flow reduction the mean arterial pressure consistently rose to 85.2 (5.2) mmHg, (p < 0.001). When the portal venous flow was re-established there was often a small rebound portal "hyperaemia" accompanied by a temporary fall in HA flow and a fall in systemic blood pressure (Figure 2b).
Figure 1

Diagram of silastic H-shaped prosthesis inserted into the portal vein and the inferior vena cava of the in vivo rabbit model. During control conditions, the prosthesis is clamped across the horizontal limb at "a". Portal-systemic diversion is achieved by removal of the clamp from "a" and cross-clamping at point "b", distal to the point of entry of the splenic vein into the portal vein.

Figure 2

The hepatic arterial buffer response during portal venous occlusion. There was a significant increase in hepatic arterial flow during portal venous occlusion (* p < 0.05) compared to basal hepatic arterial flow. HAF = hepatic arterial flow, PVF = portal venous flow and MAP = mean arterial pressure.

Table 1

The effect of portal venous flow (PVF) reduction on hepatic arterial flow (HAF) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP).

BEFORE PORTAL VENOUS OCCLUSION

AFTER PORTAL VENOUS OCCLUSION

Exp. no.

n

HAF (ml. min-1.100 g-1)

PVF (ml. min-1.100 g-1)

MAP (mmHg)

HAF (ml. min-1.100 g-1)

PVF (ml. min-1.100 g-1)

MAP (mmHg)

HAF increase (%)

Buffering capacity (%)

1

4

16.9

143.2

95.0

25.3

39.1

96.8

66.8

8.9

2

2

17.5

64.2

67.5

22.5

35.0

72.5

28.5

17.6

3

2

9.4

63.5

70.0

11.4

48.5

75.0

22.0

15.1

4

6

25.4

70.9

75.0

36.7

31.5

84.2

40.3

33.2

5

3

27.8

-

93.3

32.1

-

97.3

15.3

-

Mean (SE)

-

19.4 (3.3)

85.5 (19.3)*

80.2 (5.8)*

25.6 (4.3)

38.5 (3.7)

85.2 (5.2)

34.6 (9.1)

18.7 (5.2)

Each value is the mean of the number of observations stated. Both HAF and MAP increased significantly during PV occlusion (* p < 0.05, n = 5).

In the 5 experiments described above HAF and PVF were stable for a sufficiently long period to allow the construction of dose-response curves for HA flow responses to intra-portal injection of adenosine or ATP. Intraportal injection of ATP and adenosine both caused immediate increases in HAF (Figure 3) and the -log ED50 values (calculated from the graph) for these agents were 2.0 mg kg-1 and 1.7 mg kg-1 for ATP and adenosine respectively. Injection of ATP and adenosine had no measurable effect on PV flow.
Figure 3

The effect of intra-portal injection of (a) ATP and (b) adenosine on changes in hepatic arterial flow (Δ HAF) in vivo. Both agents increased hepatic arterial flow in a dose-dependent manner. The error bars in the graphs represent the SE.

In vitro

Group 1. The effect of intra-arterial ATP

Livers from 6 rabbits [body weight 2.93 (0.14) kg, liver weight 119.2 (13.4) g] were perfused at raised tone [HAP 146.7 (7.7) and PVP 3.3 (0.8) mmHg]. The effect of the addition of 8-SPT to the hepatic arterial and portal venous perfusate was evaluated using previously calculated mid-range doses of adenosine, ACh and sodium nitroprusside [16]. 8-SPT (10 μM) significantly inhibited the HA response to 10-7moles 100 g liver-1 intra-arterial adenosine from 50.8 (6.2) to 31.6 (8.1) mmHg (p < 0.05), but did not significantly inhibit HA responses to 10-8moles 100 g liver-1intra-arterial ACh [68.9 (6.6) to 72.2 (5.7) mmHg] or to 10-8moles 100 g liver-1intra-arterial SNP [36.3 (4.4) to 41.6 (9.7) mmHg]. The dose-related response curve to intra-arterial ATP was also shifted to the right by 8-SPT [-log Molar ED50 8.70 (0.22) to 7.63 (0.28), p < 0.001] indicating inhibition of responses to ATP (Figure 4a). The amplitude of portal venous responses to intra-arterial ATP correlated with the duration of perfusion (Figure 4b).
Figure 4

The changes in (a) hepatic arterial pressure responses (Δ HAP) and (b) portal venous pressure responses (Δ PVP) to intra-arterial injection of ATP. The adenosine receptor antagonist 8-phenyltheophylline (10 μM) significantly decreased hepatic arterial responses to ATP, while portal venous responses were unaffected (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, compared with before 8-SPT). The error bars in the graphs represent the SE.

Group 2. The effect of intra-portal ATP

Livers from another group of 6 rabbits [body weight 2.60 (0.14) kg, liver weight 98.8 (5.2) g] were perfused at raised tone [HAP 156.2 (4.8) and PVP 2.3 (0.7) mmHg]. The addition of 8-SPT to the hepatic arterial and portal venous perfusate significantly inhibited the HA response to 10-8 moles 100 g liver-1 intra-arterial adenosine from 33.2 (3.5) to 6.5 (3.8) mmHg (p < 0.001). The HA dose-related responses to mid-range doses of intra-portal ATP were also significantly reduced by 8-SPT, causing a non-significant right shift of the dose-response curve to ATP from -log Molar ED50 5.08 (0.15) to 4.97 (0.12) (p = 0.05) (Figure 5a). The portal venous responses to intra-portal injections of ATP were not significantly altered by 8-SPT (Figure 5b).
Figure 5

The changes in (a) hepatic arterial pressure responses (Δ HAP) and (b) portal venous pressure responses (Δ PVP) to intra-portal injection of ATP. The adenosine receptor antagonist 8-phenyltheophylline (10 μM) significantly decreased hepatic arterial responses to ATP, while portal venous responses were unaffected (** p < 0.01, compared with before 8-SPT). The error bars in the graphs represent the SE.

Discussion

A new model for the study of liver blood flow in the rabbit has been presented, based on a concept developed in the dog [6, 21]. The preparation employed a mesocaval shunt to divert blood to the systemic circulation during portal venous occlusion to prevent the fall in systemic blood pressure due to mesenteric pooling of portal blood [22]. This model is also closer to physiological portal venous flow conditions than models where splenectomy is necessary [2, 23]. The insertion of the prosthetic mesocaval shunt, which required a brief period of PV occlusion, can cause irreversible systemic hypotension, and this reduced the success rate. Experiments are in progress to improve this model further by the surgical construction of a mesocaval shunt, although this is difficult due to the fragility of the rabbit portal vein. Nevertheless a hepatic arterial buffer response could be clearly demonstrated in all the successful preparations. During portal venous occlusion the mean arterial blood pressure also increased but this was insufficient to account for the increase in hepatic arterial flow. This model, if further developed, may therefore prove to be an alternative to experimental models in the cat and dog for investigations of this nature.

The action of ATP in this in vivo rabbit liver model was also demonstrated. Intra-portal injection of ATP or adenosine elicited a potent vasodilatation of the hepatic artery. This action occurred over a similar dose range to that observed in our in vitro perfused rabbit liver model [17]. The HA dilator action of intra-portal ATP fulfilled the first two criteria defined by Lautt [2], equivalent to the first criterion originally proposed by Dale [24], in order to be considered as a regulator of the buffer response, namely that the addition of ATP elicited the appropriate response (vasodilatation of the HA) and portal injection of ATP permitted access to the arterial resistance sites. In addition, antagonists of adenosine, the catabolite of ATP, although indirect, partially attenuated the response, thus fulfilling the second of Dale's postulates. However, further experiments using inhibitors of these agents have proved difficult in the past and often resulted in haemodynamic instability [6] or prolonged hepatic arterial vasospasm [25]. Thus we used our comparable in vitro model as an alternative preparation for these investigations.

We have previously shown that intra-portal or intra-arterial injection of ATP dilated the rabbit HA vascular bed, and that this was mediated, at least in part, by NO [16, 17]. However, in other vessels ATP has been shown to act via adenosine receptors [19]. We therefore tested whether some of the HA dilatation to ATP was attributable to catabolism to adenosine by using the non-selective P1-purinoceptor antagonist 8-SPT [26].

Our results demonstrated that both intra-arterial and intra-portal injection of ATP caused HA vasodilatation, at least in part, through activation of P1-purinoceptors. The way in which 8-SPT inhibited responses to ATP was of interest. The responses to lower doses of ATP were unaffected, as expected, because ATP is a more potent vasodilator than adenosine, but the 'middle range' doses of ATP were certainly inhibited, while higher doses were not. These data do not contradict our earlier findings where HA vasodilatation to ATP did not appear to be affected by 8-SPT [9]. The previous study only reported the action of 8-SPT at the two highest doses of ATP used, due to constraints of time upon the viability of the preparation, since characterised in greater detail by Browse et al [27]. The data points at the two highest doses used in this study conformed with these since only responses to mid-range doses of ATP were significantly attenuated. This may have been due to the overwhelming of competitive inhibition at high doses or have been indicative of a different mechanism of ATP and/or adenosine action [28].

There was no apparent difference in the degree of inhibition of HA responses by 8-SPT between intra-arterial and intra-portal injection of ATP despite a longer lag-time between injection and response following intra-portal injection of ATP. This might suggest that nearly all the adenosine produced from ATP catabolism was taken up effectively by the endothelium and vascular smooth muscle [18] as soon as the adenosine was formed, and that only the adenosine formed in the hepatic arterial vasculature from ATP catabolism contributed to the hepatic arterial response to ATP. This occurred despite the presumably higher concentration of adenosine in the liver as a whole following intra-portal (10-8 - 10-4 log moles ATP 100 g liver-1) compared with intra-arterial injections (10-10 - 10-6 log moles ATP 100 g liver-1) of ATP.

This 8-SPT-induced inhibition of responses to ATP raises the possibility that, in studies where 8-SPT reduced the magnitude of the buffer response [2, 6], the primary agent responsible for the buffer response could have been ATP and not adenosine. Further studies will be required to distinguish between these two agents. Firstly, the inhibition by 8-SPT of the ATP induced HA vasodilatation must be shown to occur in vivo. Secondly, if ATP is the primary agent, the buffer response may also be, at least partially, inhibited by an NO synthesis inhibitor because we have previously reported that ATP-induced but not adenosine-induced HA vasodilatation is attenuated by such an inhibitor in the rabbit liver [6]; and thirdly, vascular responses to adenosine must be shown to be independent of NO, because recent evidence from the hypoxic guinea-pig heart has suggested that adenosine may act via A2-purinoceptors to release nitric oxide [29] and this point should be considered in this model.

Conclusions

In summary, a new in vivo rabbit liver model for the investigation of liver blood flow has been presented which, although at an early stage of development, may prove to be a useful model. The hepatic arterial buffer response and the hepatic arterial vasodilatation elicited by ATP and by adenosine have been consistently and reproducibly demonstrated. In an established in vitro model, hepatic arterial vasodilatation elicited by ATP has been shown to be partly mediated through P1-purinoceptors suggesting that ATP could have a role in the generation of the buffer response in the rabbit liver.

Methods

Experiments were carried out in a total of 27 male New Zealand white rabbits weighing 2.2 – 3.4 kg, fed and permitted access to water ad libitum. The experimental protocols were approved by the guidelines and legislative procedures outlined by the Home Office of the United Kingdom in the Animal Scientific Procedures Act 1986. Pre-operative sedation was with fentanyl/fluanisone s.c. ('Hypnorm', 0.3 ml kg-1, Janssen Animal Health).

In vivoexperiments (n = 15)

Anaesthesia was induced in rabbits [2.8 (0.1) kg] with midazolam ('Hypnovel', 0.3 ml kg-1, Roche Products Limited) and maintained with a continuous infusion of 'Hypnorm' (0.1 – 0.3 ml kg-1 hr-1) through a cannulated marginal ear vein. The rabbits were intubated but allowed to breathe spontaneously. The inspired oxygen was adjusted to maintain arterial PO2 and PCO2 at normal levels (approximately 100 mmHg and 40 mmHg, respectively) and body temperature was kept at 36–38°C by operating table heating elements. Fluid balance was achieved by intravenous infusion of 150 mM sodium chloride and acid-base balance maintained by injection of sodium bicarbonate as required.

Operative procedure

The experimental preparation was based upon a model we have previously established in the dog [21, 30]. After cannulation of the carotid artery for blood pressure monitoring, a midline laparotomy was performed and the inflow vessels to the liver dissected. The gastroduodenal artery and vein were ligated and divided. A prosthetic (H-shaped) mesocaval shunt, constructed from 3.0 mm internal diameter silicone rubber tubing, was inserted proximal to the splenic vein after heparinisation (300 iu. kg-1 i.v.). This allowed diversion of mesenteric blood flow to the systemic circulation as required. A clamp was placed on the cross limb of the "H" to restore portal flow. Pre-calibrated electromagnetic flow probes (Statham) were applied to the common hepatic artery and portal vein (1 and 3 mm diameter respectively) (Figure 1).

Experimental protocol

After 1 hour equilibration, the effect of a reduction in PV flow on HA flow (i.e. the buffer response) was tested. PV flow was reduced by clamping the mesenteric vein, proximal to the insertion of the splenic vein, and opening the mesocaval shunt for 3 min. This procedure, which diverts mesenteric flow into the systemic circulation reduces portal flow to that of splenic vein flow was conducted at least twice per experiment (see Table 1). Measurement of the buffer response was then recorded as absolute flow values from the precalibrated electromagnetic flow probes. Hepatic blood flow was then restored by removal of the vascular clamp on the PV, and reapplication of the anastomotic clamp to the cross-limb of the H-shunt.

When haemodynamic stability had been achieved, incremental doses of ATP or adenosine (1 μg kg-1 – 0.5 mg kg-1) (Sigma U.K. Ltd), dissolved in saline, were injected into the portal vein and changes in HA or PV blood flow could again be recorded as absolute values from the precalibrated electromagnetic flow meters. Dose-response curves of changes in blood flow vs dose of drug injected were then constructed.

Calculations

Blood flows were recorded on the flowmeters in ml min-1 and subsequently recalculated in ml min-1 100 g-1 by relating the readings to the wet weight of the liver, determined at the end of each experiment. The "buffering capacity" of the HA was expressed in % as:

[Increase in HA flow / Decrease in PV flow] × 100

In vitroexperiments (n = 12)

Twelve rabbits were anaesthetised with Hypnovel (midazolam) 1.5 mg kg-1 i.v., and a further 0.3 ml kg-1 Hypnorm was injected i.m. for continued analgesia during the 40 minute operative period. The operative technique has been described in detail elsewhere [20] but will be outlined in brief here. The abdomen was opened though a mid-line incision, and the common bile duct cannulated to facilitate exposure and cannulation of the common hepatic and gastroduodenal artery in addition for the collection of bile during perfusion. After administration of heparin i.v. (300 units kg-1) the common hepatic artery and the gastroduodenal artery were cannulated (Portex 3FG). Ten ml of heparinised saline (20 units ml-1) were infused into the catheters to prevent intrahepatic coagulation. The gastroduodenal vein was ligated, the PV cannulated and 40 ml of heparinised saline flushed through the PV system. The liver was then rapidly excised from the animal, weighed and placed in an organ bath.

Liver perfusion

Livers were perfused via the HA and PV cannulae at constant flow rates of 25 and 75 ml min-1 100 g liver-1 respectively. The perfusate used was Krebs-Bülbring buffer solution (composition mmoles L-1: NaCl 133, KCl 4.7, NaH2PO4 1.35, NaHCO3 20.0, MgSO4 0.61, Glucose 7.8, and CaCl2 2.52) at 37°C, from a common oxygenated reservoir (95% O2: 5% CO2). Homogeneous liver perfusion was indicated by all sections of the liver changing to a uniform colour. Changes in vascular tone were recorded as changes in perfusion pressure measured with Spectramed (Statham) P23XL physiological pressure transducers from side arms of the perfusion circuit and from the gastroduodenal artery cannula. These were recorded on a Grass 79 F polygraph (Grass Instrument Co., Quincy, Mass., USA). Perfusion under these conditions maintains liver viability for 5 hours [27].

Experimental protocol

Methoxamine was added to the perfusate at a -log Molar concentration of 5.27 (0.05) to raise the tone of the preparation. Two groups of rabbits were studied: ATP injection into the HA (Group 1), and ATP injection into the PV (Group 2). Dose response curves were constructed to ATP (10-10 to 10-6 moles 100 g liver-1 for intra-arterial, and 10-8 to 10-4 moles 100 g liver-1 for intra-portal injection) and repeated after a 15 minute equilibration period following the addition of the water soluble derivative of 8-phenyltheophylline (8-PT, 8-(p-sulphophenyl)-theophylline (8-SPT) (Research Biochemicals Inc.), to the arterial and venous perfusate. Single HA doses of acetylcholine (ACh, 10-7 moles 100 g liver-1) and/or sodium nitroprusside (SNP, 10-8 moles 100 g liver-1) were given at regular intervals throughout the experiment to confirm the maintenance of the vascular responses with time, while intra-arterial doses of 10-7 moles 100 g liver-1 adenosine (the catabolite of ATP) were given to confirm inhibition by 8-SPT [6, 16]. All drugs were made up in saline.

Statistical analysis

The data was confirmed to be normally distributed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and also that the variances of the data were not significantly different using Graphpad, copyright 1994–1996 by GraphPad Software Inc. Student's paired t-test was therefore used to test the significance of differences between observations before and after PV occlusion, and the magnitude of vascular responses to ATP before and during administration of 8-SPT. Significance level was always taken at α = 0.05. All data are presented as mean (SE).

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This project was generously supported by both the Joint Research Committee of King's College School of Medicine & Dentistry and the Central Research Committee of the University of London.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Liver Sciences Unit, Academic Department of Surgery, GKT School of Medicine and Dentistry, St Thomas' Hospital
(2)
Division of Surgery, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital

References

  1. WW Lautt: Role and control of the hepatic artery. Hepatic circulation in health and disease. Edited by: Lautt WW. 1981, New York, Raven Press, 203-220.Google Scholar
  2. Lautt WW, Legare DJ, d'Almeida MS: Adenosine as putative regulator of hepatic arterial flow (the buffer response). Am J Physiol. 1985, 248: H331-H338.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander B: The role of adenosine, ATP and nitric oxide in portal venous-induced hepatic arterial vasodilatation. Liver Innervation. Edited by: Shimazu T. 1996, New York, James Libbey & Co Ltd, 283-288.Google Scholar
  4. Alexander B, Mathie RT: Diminished hyperaemic response of the hepatic artery to portal venous occlusion (the buffer response) in Asian hybrid minipigs: a comparison of the response to that observed in dogs. J Comp Physiol [B]. 1993, 163: 5-10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Browse DJ, Mathie RT, Benjamin IS, Alexander B: The action of ATP on the hepatic arterial and portal venous vascular networks of the rabbit liver: the role of adenosine. Eur J Pharmacol. 1997, 320: 139-144. 10.1016/S0014-2999(96)00887-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mathie RT, Alexander B: The role of adenosine in the hyperaemic response of the hepatic artery to portal vein occlusion (the 'buffer response'). Br J Pharmacol. 1990, 100: 626-630.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Burnstock G: Local control of blood pressure by purines. Blood vessels. 1987, Springfield, Illinois, 24: 156-160.Google Scholar
  8. Su C: Extracellular functions of nucleotides in heart and blood vessels. Annu Rev Physiol. 1985, 47: 665-676. 10.1146/annurev.ph.47.030185.003313.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ralevic V, Mathie RT, Alexander B, Burnstock G: Characterization of P2X- and P2Y-purinoceptors in the rabbit hepatic arterial vasculature. Br J Pharmacol. 1991, 103: 1108-1113.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bergfeld GR, Forrester T: Release of ATP from human erythrocytes in response to a brief period of hypoxia and hypercapnia. Cardiovasc Res. 1992, 26: 40-47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bodin P, Bailey D, Burnstock G: Increased flow-induced ATP release from isolated vascular endothelial cells but not smooth muscle cells. Br J Pharmacol. 1991, 103: 1203-1205.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Palmer RM, Ferrige AG, Moncada S: Nitric oxide release accounts for the biological activity of endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Nature. 1987, 327: 524-526. 10.1038/327524a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Belloni FL, Elkin PL, Giannotto B: The mechanism of adenosine release from hypoxic rat liver cells. Br J Pharmacol. 1985, 85: 441-446.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ralevic V, Milner P, Kirkpatrick KA, Burnstock G: Flow-induced release of adenosine 5'-triphosphate from endothelial cells of the rat mesenteric arterial bed. Experientia. 1992, 48: 31-34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Brizzolara AL, Burnstock G: Endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilatation of the hepatic artery of the rabbit. Br J Pharmacol. 1991, 103: 1206-1212.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mathie RT, Ralevic V, Alexander B, Burnstock G: Nitric oxide is the mediator of ATP-induced dilatation of the rabbit hepatic arterial vascular bed. Br J Pharmacol. 1991, 103: 1602-1606.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Browse DJ, Mathie RT, Benjamin IS, Alexander B: The transhepatic action of ATP on the hepatic arterial and portal venous vascular beds of the rabbit: the role of nitric oxide. Br J Pharmacol. 1994, 113: 987-993.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pearson JD, Carleton JS, Gordon JL: Metabolism of adenine nucleotides by ectoenzymes of vascular endothelial and smooth-muscle cells in culture. Biochem J. 1980, 190: 421-429.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kennedy C, Burnstock G: ATP produces vasodilation via P1 purinoceptors and vasoconstriction via P2 purinoceptors in the isolated rabbit central ear artery. Blood vessels. 1985, 22: 145-155.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Alexander B, Mathie RT, Ralevic V, Burnstock G: An isolated dual-perfused rabbit liver preparation for the study of hepatic blood flow regulation. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 1992, 27: 17-22. 10.1016/1056-8719(92)90015-S.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Mathie RT, Lam PH, Harper AM, Blumgart LH: The hepatic arterial blood flow response to portal vein occlusion in the dog: the effect of hepatic denervation. Pflugers Arch. 1980, 386: 77-83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. R Burton-Opitz: The vascularity of the liver:the influence of the portal blood flow upon the fllow in the hepatic artery. Quart J Exp Physiol. 1911, 4: 93-102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Ezzat WR, Lautt WW: Hepatic arterial pressure-flow autoregulation is adenosine mediated. Am J Physiol. 1987, 252: H836-H845.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. H Dale: Nomenclature of fibres in the autonomic nervous system and their effects. J Physiol. 1933, 80: 10-15.Google Scholar
  25. Lautt WW, Legare DJ, Daniels TR: The comparative effect of administration of substances via the hepatic artery or portal vein on hepatic arterial resistance, liver blood volume and hepatic extraction in cats. Hepatology. 1984, 4: 927-932.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Griffith SG, Meghji P, Moody CJ, Burnstock G: 8-phenyltheophylline: a potent P1-purinoceptor antagonist. Eur J Pharmacol. 1981, 75: 61-64. 10.1016/0014-2999(81)90346-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Browse DJ, Benjamin IS, Alexander B: An evaluation of whether duration of perfusion alters vascular responses in the isolated dual-perfused rabbit liver. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 1994, 32: 117-122. 10.1016/1056-8719(94)90063-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Chinellato A, Ragazzi E, Pandolfo L, Froldi G, Caparrotta L, Fassina G: Pharmacological characterization of a new purinergic receptor site in rabbit aorta. Gen Pharmacol. 1992, 23: 1067-1071. 10.1016/0306-3623(92)90288-U.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Vials A, Burnstock G: A2-purinoceptor-mediated relaxation in the guinea-pig coronary vasculature: a role for nitric oxide. Br J Pharmacol. 1993, 109: 424-429.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mathie RT, Blumgart LH: The hepatic haemodynamic response to acute portal venous blood flow reductions in the dog. Pflugers Arch. 1983, 399: 223-227.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Browse et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.

Advertisement